|
I'm new here, please be gentle This is where you can "introduce yourself". A chance for you as a new member to say hello and for you to tell us about yourselves, your truck and your other interests. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
13-12-2010, 16:30 | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: dorset
Vehicle: mazda bongo,at the moment
Posts: 79
|
Thanks guys,na i hate landies...did look at land cruiser ,but some saythey go wrong and cost a bomb to fix.
saw a really good cond one 65k old g reg fsh in top cond.. bit of a tank but was 1650. still i come back to t2! Thanks for all your help! |
13-12-2010, 16:34 | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central England, in the Heart of the Black Country
Vehicle: T2 2004 TDI SE LWB
Posts: 7,740
|
i agree about repair costs and one of the reasons for that is the permanant 4x4 putting a lot of strain on the drive train and steering, it drags a lot on tarmac, and with the diff not locked it's not much good anyway!
LR's are made in england have a long history both of these facts have added to their 'mystical' prowess, and you can get lots of 'off the shelf' mods, but they aren't the be all and end all of the 4x4 world by anymeans! I have owned all sorts of 4x4's ovwer the years i've even had 5 Troopers and there isn't anything better than a t2! - different yes, better no! |
13-12-2010, 20:43 | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: dorset
Vehicle: mazda bongo,at the moment
Posts: 79
|
I like ther nissan terrano buti think the boot is too small,dont think there is thatworry on a land cruiser!
regards jez |
13-12-2010, 20:52 | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central England, in the Heart of the Black Country
Vehicle: T2 2004 TDI SE LWB
Posts: 7,740
|
I see your point, but the swb's compact design still leaves it with a bigger boot than many simmilar 4x4's (shogun for instance) I to a lot of very big trailers and the lenght of a ranger or simmilar makes it impossible to negotiate tight bends when reversing tino small spaces. So size isn't everything
But then if it's boot space you want there is plenty of room in a transit van! and a couple of different 4x4 options too |
13-12-2010, 20:54 | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: peoples democratic republic of west yorkshire
Vehicle: " alice "
Posts: 10,473
|
or .... get a patrol
|
13-12-2010, 20:56 | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central England, in the Heart of the Black Country
Vehicle: T2 2004 TDI SE LWB
Posts: 7,740
|
|
13-12-2010, 21:15 | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: devon
Vehicle: terrano 2.7tdi SE+ (X)reg
Posts: 1,674
|
the older landrovers had manual freewheeling hubs and no centre diff so same set up as the terrano but with out the rear lsd
|
13-12-2010, 21:24 | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central England, in the Heart of the Black Country
Vehicle: T2 2004 TDI SE LWB
Posts: 7,740
|
When i was a kid we lived next to a man who repaired and restored landies for a living (still does) and i got to know them fairly well, I understood that the manual; hubs were an add on, not a standard feature to overcome the problems of permanent 4wd! I don't think they were ever standard. Though i'll stand corrected if i am wrong!
|
13-12-2010, 21:27 | #24 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: dorset
Vehicle: mazda bongo,at the moment
Posts: 79
|
Will have to have a propper look round at one,its hard to tell in the pics.
See loads about and they look quite a good size,anyone got any pics of thier boot lurking about ? terranos do seem like a great option and you guys on here are helpfull ,We some how scoot round other ideas and come bouncing back,my wifes loves the terrano a Landy is gone from bottom possition to no longer on the list,surfs look a bit tatty,landcrusier may just be too big...pajero not keen none have any service on them,nissan patrol again very big! Thankis for putting up with me on here,will buy something in the end! |
13-12-2010, 21:29 | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central England, in the Heart of the Black Country
Vehicle: T2 2004 TDI SE LWB
Posts: 7,740
|
Quote:
|
|
13-12-2010, 21:35 | #26 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: dorset
Vehicle: mazda bongo,at the moment
Posts: 79
|
|
13-12-2010, 21:36 | #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: peoples democratic republic of west yorkshire
Vehicle: " alice "
Posts: 10,473
|
Quote:
|
|
13-12-2010, 21:40 | #28 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: dorset
Vehicle: mazda bongo,at the moment
Posts: 79
|
65k fsh i though was a good price?maybe not! ooops
plank,thanks mate |
13-12-2010, 21:59 | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Manchester
Vehicle: Ford Maverick 2.7 LWB GLX
Posts: 1,519
|
the boot thing was one reason why i didnt go for a mav/t2 and the trooper offered a better option seat wise and the inside is alot bigger i have noticed
having played with the 3 4x4's i have had they only one to get stuck in 4wd was the mk1 paj, the mav and the trooper show no difference in off road ability both are capable of going anywhere a land rover can maintanace tho have found the mav to be more expensive to keep and to run |
13-12-2010, 22:02 | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: All hail to the Glove of Love...
Posts: 9,212
|
|
|
|